{"id":812,"date":"2015-10-21T08:24:33","date_gmt":"2015-10-21T06:24:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/wordpress\/index.php\/fapedavalidation1\/"},"modified":"2021-06-14T11:13:35","modified_gmt":"2021-06-14T09:13:35","slug":"fapedavalidation1","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.eda-ltd.com.tr\/index.php\/urunler\/fapeda-2\/fapedavalidation1\/","title":{"rendered":"FAPeda Validation"},"content":{"rendered":"

FAPeda VALIDATION 1: <\/span><\/strong><\/span>
\nSupersonic Test Case: NASA Tandem Missile Geometry from \u201cRTO Applied Vehicle Technology Panel (AVT) TG-082\u201d [1]<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/h1>\n\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Figure 1.<\/strong> <\/span>NASA Tandem Missile Geometry <\/span>[1]<\/span><\/span><\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

TABLE 1. Comparison of CFD Results with experimental data at\u00a0 M=1.75,\u00a0 Alpha=6 deg.<\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n\n<\/colgroup>\n<\/colgroup>\n<\/colgroup>\n<\/colgroup>\n<\/colgroup>\n<\/colgroup>\n<\/colgroup>\n<\/colgroup>\n<\/colgroup>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Authors<\/strong><\/td>\nOrganization<\/strong><\/td>\nSolver (Tur.mod.)<\/strong><\/td>\nAlpha<\/strong><\/td>\nCA<\/strong><\/td>\nCN<\/strong><\/td>\nCm<\/strong><\/td>\nCA_err<\/strong><\/td>\nCN_err<\/strong><\/td>\ncm_err<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nNASA (USA)<\/td>\nexp<\/td>\n5.946<\/td>\n0.5594<\/td>\n1.9856<\/td>\n0.8521<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Khalid<\/td>\nNRC (CA)<\/td>\nWIND (SA)<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n0.4930<\/td>\n1.9900<\/td>\n0.9730<\/td>\n-0.0664<\/td>\n0.0044<\/td>\n-0.1209<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Henig<\/td>\nLFK (GE)<\/td>\nFASTRAN (k-e)<\/td>\n5.9<\/td>\n0.7310<\/td>\n2.1020<\/td>\n0.8190<\/td>\n0.1716<\/td>\n0.1164<\/td>\n0.0331<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Prince<\/td>\nQinetiQ (UK)<\/td>\nFLUENT (SA)<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n0.4706<\/td>\n2.0320<\/td>\n0.8370<\/td>\n-0.0888<\/td>\n0.0464<\/td>\n0.0151<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Leavitt<\/td>\nNASA (USA)<\/td>\nUSM3Dns (SA)<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n0.7365<\/td>\n2.0700<\/td>\n0.8200<\/td>\n0.1771<\/td>\n0.0844<\/td>\n0.0321<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Dujardin<\/td>\nDLR (GE)<\/td>\nTAU (SA)<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n0.6845<\/td>\n2.0310<\/td>\n0.9230<\/td>\n0.1251<\/td>\n0.0454<\/td>\n-0.0709<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Dujardin<\/td>\nDLR (GE)<\/td>\nTAU (k-w)<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n0.6104<\/td>\n2.0090<\/td>\n0.8470<\/td>\n0.051<\/td>\n0.0234<\/td>\n0.0051<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Oktay<\/td>\nEDA (TR)<\/td>\nFAPeda (SA)<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n0.5974<\/td>\n2.0860<\/td>\n0.8070<\/td>\n0.038<\/td>\n0.1004<\/td>\n0.0451<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

Figure 2. <\/strong>Differences Between <\/span>Measured and Predicted Axial <\/span>Force Coefficient<\/span> CA for different solvers<\/span><\/span><\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

<\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

Figure 3. <\/strong><\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/strong>Differences Between <\/span><\/span>Measured and Predicted<\/span> Normal Force Coefficient<\/span> CN for different solvers<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

<\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

Figure 4. <\/strong><\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/strong>Differences Between <\/span><\/span>Measured and Predicted<\/span> Pitch Moment Coefficien<\/span>t Cm for different solvers<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

References:<\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. \n

    RTO Applied Vehicle Technology Panel (AVT) TG-082, \u201c<\/span><\/span>Assessment of Turbulence Modeling <\/span><\/span>for High-Speed Vehicl<\/span><\/span>es\u201d, TR-AVT-082, 2005.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    FAPeda VALIDATION 1: Supersonic Test Case: NASA Tandem Missile Geometry from \u201cRTO Applied Vehicle Technology Panel (AVT) TG-082\u201d [1]   Figure 1. NASA Tandem Missile Geometry [1] TABLE 1. Comparison of CFD Results with experimental data at\u00a0 M=1.75,\u00a0 Alpha=6 deg. Authors Organization Solver (Tur.mod.) Alpha CA CN Cm CA_err CN_err cm_err NASA (USA) exp 5.946 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":4411,"menu_order":130,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.eda-ltd.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/812"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.eda-ltd.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.eda-ltd.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.eda-ltd.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.eda-ltd.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=812"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.eda-ltd.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/812\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4638,"href":"https:\/\/www.eda-ltd.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/812\/revisions\/4638"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.eda-ltd.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4411"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.eda-ltd.com.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=812"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}